---

Forex multi-account manager Z-X-N
Accepts global forex account operation, investment, and trading
Assists family office investment and autonomous management

---

In the forex margin trading market, a fundamental question must first be answered: Do participants view short-term gains as their sole objective, or do they view trading as a profession requiring long-term investment and continuous improvement? Different answers to this question determine all subsequent behavioral patterns and risk exposure structures.

---

If trading is viewed solely as a tool for quick profits, every price fluctuation directly translates into immediate emotional feedback—profits bring fleeting euphoria, while losses trigger intense pain. In this situation, risk management rules are easily replaced by impulsive trading, and strategy execution is hijacked by changes in account equity, ultimately forming a negative cycle of "high-frequency trading—high-cost losses—emotional decision-making." Over time, the capital curve continues to decline, the psychological stress threshold decreases, and the trading experience naturally becomes difficult and even painful.
Conversely, if trading is positioned as a profession or a research subject, any market outcome will be incorporated into the sample statistical framework: profits are seen as validation points for strategy effectiveness, and losses are recorded as necessary information for model improvement.
At this point, a single large drawdown is no longer simply attributed to "bad luck," but is redefined as "overspending on risk budget" or "failure of hypothesis testing," thus triggering a system review and parameter adjustment process. Emotional shocks are absorbed by the institutionalized review mechanism, and the trading process becomes more stable and repeatable.
The difference in perspective is essentially the difference between "passive acceptance" and "active management." The former treats market fluctuations as external threats, while the latter views fluctuations as observable, quantifiable, and exploitable experimental conditions. The same event is given drastically different meanings under different frameworks, leading to drastically different response paths.
A similar logic exists in the traditional workplace. Two programmers face the same project requirement: one understands it as "passively completing a task," while the other sees it as "an experimental scenario for validating a new technology stack." The former focuses on minimizing personal input, while the latter focuses on maximizing cognitive gains. In the short term, both deliver code, but in the long term, the divergence in knowledge accumulation and career trajectory becomes increasingly significant.
A more extreme contrast can be seen in two states with highly similar physical spaces but completely opposite psychological spaces: a prison cell and a secluded retreat. Both restrict movement and simplify living conditions, but the former is imposed externally, while the latter is chosen actively by the individual. The direction of the lock determines the nature of the experience: being locked causes pain, while self-locking fosters focus; the former involves a countdown to release, while the latter involves a countdown to advancement; seemingly identical physical constraints lead to drastically different psychological outcomes due to the different ownership of control.
Returning to the forex trading scenario, when participants clarify the primary and secondary relationship between "profit-seeking" and "professional positioning," they complete a crucial leap from passive response to proactive design. Afterward, the capital curve is no longer randomly drawn by market conditions but continuously plotted by risk management rules with positive expected value; individual profits and losses no longer trigger value judgments but merely serve as inevitable samples under the law of large numbers. Thus, trading behavior departs from the zero-sum context of "seeking quick money" and enters the professional context of "seeking systemic stability." Profit becomes a byproduct of consistent long-term execution, rather than a direct goal driven by emotions. In other words, clarifying the direction of motivation is equivalent to changing the lock to the inside, holding the key in one's own hand, and transforming market fluctuations from an external threat into internal nourishment, bringing one closer to a sustainable profit path.

The core criterion for Swiss citizens providing asset management services is not nationality, but rather whether they fully meet a series of requirements.

---

In the field of two-way foreign exchange investment, both MAM (Multi-Account Manager) and PAMM (Percentage Allocation Management Module) fall under the category of asset management on behalf of clients. For non-Swiss citizens, the ability to provide related services to Swiss citizens using these two models is not directly determined by nationality. The core issue is whether they can fully meet the stringent regulatory requirements set by the Swiss Financial Market Supervisory Authority (FINMA), including qualification licensing, company structure, and professional conduct standards. The relevant compliance conditions can be analyzed in detail from three core dimensions: qualification access, supporting entities, and regulatory compliance. These dimensions are interconnected and indispensable, forming the prerequisite for legally conducting business.
The primary and core requirement is obtaining the corresponding asset management qualification license. Switzerland implements extremely strict regulatory standards for asset management activities. Regardless of whether the service provider is a Swiss citizen, anyone conducting asset management services such as MAM or PAMM for commercial purposes must first obtain the relevant authorization documents or regulatory licenses issued by FINMA. Commercial operations without a license will be considered illegal. Specifically, if a non-Swiss citizen acts as an overseas manager and plans to station employees in Switzerland long-term to manage related assets, they must submit an application to FINMA in advance and obtain approval before legally establishing a branch. The establishment process and operational standards of the branch must also fully comply with FINMA's regulatory requirements. For portfolio management businesses that are highly tied to the PAMM and MAM models, practitioners must also obtain a special license issued by FINMA and be subject to continuous supervision and inspection by FINMA throughout their operations. The scope of supervision covers key aspects such as the standardization of business operations and the implementation of client rights protection, ensuring that the entire business process complies with regulatory bottom lines.
Secondly, compliance requirements for both individuals and institutions must be met. If a non-Swiss citizen chooses to conduct MAM/PAMM-related asset management business under an institutional name, its institutional structure must strictly comply with the explicit provisions of relevant Swiss laws and regulations. Regarding the core management team, the institution must have at least one director who is a Swiss or EU citizen and actually resides in Switzerland; if the institution has a large number of directors, a majority must be Swiss citizens. This requirement aims to ensure effective alignment between the institution's operations and the Swiss regulatory system. Simultaneously, the institution must meet basic requirements regarding organizational structure and financial strength. For example, it must establish an internal governance structure and risk control system that complies with regulatory requirements. In terms of capital, institutions registering to conduct related business must have paid-in capital of no less than CHF 20,000, and this capital must be fully paid up and subject to regulatory verification. At the individual practitioner level, practitioners must submit documentation to regulatory agencies proving they have no history of misconduct, demonstrating their professional qualifications and capabilities required to conduct the relevant business. If the business process involves anti-money laundering operations, an additional personal compliance file is required. This file must include key information such as compliance training records and anti-money laundering operation awareness assessment results, ensuring that the individual's professional conduct complies with compliance standards.
Furthermore, conducting such business requires strict adherence to specific regulatory rules and industry self-regulatory norms. In addition to being directly regulated by FINMA, related asset management activities may also need to comply with corresponding industry self-regulatory requirements. In practice, one common compliance path is to join an industry self-regulatory organization recognized by FINMA, such as the Association of Financial Intermediaries in the French-speaking Region of Switzerland (ARIF). Becoming a member of such a self-regulatory organization requires meeting a series of prerequisites, including possessing the corresponding professional capabilities, completing the required duration of compliance training, and passing the assessment. Only by becoming a member of a compliant self-regulatory organization can one more effectively conduct portfolio management activities, including MAM and PAMM models. Simultaneously, throughout the entire service period, strict adherence to Swiss anti-money laundering laws, investor protection laws, and other relevant laws and regulations is required. This ensures transparency and traceability in all aspects of fund raising, asset custody, investment operations, and profit distribution, effectively protecting investors' legitimate rights and interests and preventing violations such as misappropriation of funds or insufficient information disclosure.
In summary, the core criterion for determining whether non-Swiss citizens can legally use the MAM or PAMM model to provide asset management services to Swiss citizens is not nationality, but rather whether they fully meet the aforementioned requirements regarding qualifications, institutional structure, personal conduct, and compliant operation. As long as they fully comply with all regulatory and standard requirements, non-Swiss citizens can legally conduct related business. Conversely, if they fail to obtain the corresponding FINMA license, have an inappropriate institutional structure, or fail to comply with anti-money laundering and industry self-regulation requirements, regardless of their nationality, conducting such asset management business will be considered a violation by Swiss regulatory authorities and will face legal consequences such as administrative penalties and business shutdowns.

Both parties need to sign a compliance agreement, clarifying rights and responsibilities to ensure smooth cooperation. This approach is particularly common among external fund managers using PAMM/MAM systems, who cleverly circumvent the direct licensing difficulties and conduct business steadily.

---

In the two-way trading field of forex investment, non-Swiss citizens can indeed provide professional investment management services to Swiss citizens through MAM (Multi-Account Manager) or PAMM (Percentage Allocation Management Module) management models. However, this operation must be carried out under Switzerland's stringent financial regulatory framework; any negligence may cross regulatory red lines and lead to serious consequences.
The Swiss financial regulatory system is renowned for its rigor and efficiency, especially in its comprehensive and thorough oversight of financial services such as asset management, investment advice, and fund management. FINMA (Swiss Financial Market Supervisory Authority), as the core regulatory body, bears the heavy responsibility of authorizing and supervising financial intermediaries to ensure market order.
Since 2020, the Financial Services Act (FinSA) and the Financial Institutions Act (FinIA) have been officially implemented, drawing clear red lines for the investment services sector. All individuals or companies providing investment services must hold the corresponding licenses, and operating without a license will face severe penalties.
Regarding the necessity of a license, the key factors are not the nationality of the service provider, but rather the following: whether the service precisely targets the Swiss market or customer group, covering Swiss residents and citizens; whether the nature of the service touches on sensitive areas such as "asset management" or "investment advice," which typically require a license; whether the provider has a business location in Switzerland or consistently and frequently extends "olive branches" to Swiss clients; and whether the service utilizes the resources of authorized Swiss intermediaries, such as licensed banks or asset management companies, to conduct business. Crucially, even if a non-Swiss citizen is located abroad, such as in Cyprus, the UK, or Singapore, if their PAMM/MAM services are deemed to be "actively soliciting" Swiss clients or have become a regular service pattern, FINMA's regulatory requirements may be triggered instantly, without question.
Faced with stringent regulations, non-Swiss citizens are not helpless; several compliance paths are available. First, they can directly confront the challenge by applying for FINMA authorization to become licensed asset managers. However, this is far from easy; the process is complex and costly, requiring multiple stringent conditions such as capital strength, professional competence, and anti-money laundering (AML) compliance. It is difficult to achieve without thorough preparation and capability. Second, they can leverage existing resources by partnering with FINMA-authorized Swiss institutions, such as banks and asset management companies. These institutions, as legal entities, provide the services, while non-Swiss citizens act as technical or strategic advisors, contributing their expertise behind the scenes. Both parties need to sign a compliance agreement clarifying responsibilities and ensuring smooth cooperation. This path is particularly common among external fund managers using PAMM/MAM systems, who cleverly circumvent the direct licensing difficulties and conduct business steadily. Third, they can carefully select their clients, resisting the urge to "actively solicit" clients, providing services only occasionally to a few Swiss clients, with all services conducted overseas. This "reverse solicitation" model, theoretically, enjoys regulatory exemptions. However, it's important to note that this exception is being gradually squeezed by regulators, and the risks are quietly increasing. Careful evaluation and thorough consideration are essential before proceeding.
Cross-border services also involve the challenge of international regulatory coordination. If a non-Swiss citizen's country of residence is subject to international regulations such as the EU's MiFID II, the UK's FCA, or Cyprus's CySEC, these prestigious licenses cannot operate freely in Switzerland. Mutual recognition of financial regulations between Switzerland and the EU is not yet fully implemented, and barriers to international regulatory coordination remain. Non-Swiss citizens need to face this reality and plan their strategies in advance.
In conclusion, for non-Swiss citizens using MAM/PAMM services for Swiss citizens, nationality is not the obstacle; regulatory compliance is the core key. Only by deeply ingraining a compliance mindset, accurately grasping the regulatory landscape, and choosing the right compliance path can one steadily cultivate this fertile ground of finance, reap investment rewards, and realize the dream of wealth appreciation.

Strict account opening requirements are set for Chinese citizens who only hold a mainland China ID card and have a registered mainland China address, but do not have long-term residency status abroad, proof of employment abroad, or foreign tax residency status. Most compliant brokers will even directly refuse to provide account opening services to this group.

---

In the context of two-way forex trading, the US federal government has not issued explicit regulations restricting or prohibiting Chinese citizens from opening related trading accounts. However, it should be clarified that forex brokers regulated by the US Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) and the National Futures Association (NFA) generally combine cross-border compliance management, anti-money laundering (AML) requirements, and customer due diligence (CDD) processes to set strict account opening requirements for Chinese citizens who only hold a mainland China ID card and have a registered mainland China address, but do not have long-term residency status abroad, proof of employment abroad, or foreign tax residency status. Most compliant brokers will even directly refuse to provide account opening services to this group.
In essence, this account opening restriction does not stem from an explicit ban at the US government level. The core driving factors lie in the risk control needs of brokers themselves and the objective requirements of cross-border regulatory coordination.
Looking at the core factors specifically affecting account opening, the first is the constraint brought about by the differences between regulatory compliance requirements and broker policies. The CFTC and NFA have formulated a series of strict regulatory rules for retail forex trading, including core requirements such as leverage limits for major currency pairs (maximum 50:1), mandatory segregation of client funds, and full disclosure of broker financial information. To effectively avoid the potential risks brought about by cross-border regulation, most regulated forex brokers explicitly stipulate in their account opening terms that they will not provide services to non-US tax residents or non-local long-term residents of mainland China, and will only open account opening channels to Chinese citizens holding US permanent residency (green card), US work visas, long-term residency certificates, or possessing US tax residency status (such as being able to submit W-9 tax forms). Taking licensed forex firms in the US as an example, their current account opening verification process for Chinese citizens explicitly requires proof of long-term overseas work or residence, such as overseas utility bills, formal employment contracts, and residence permits. Applications based solely on mainland Chinese documents are almost impossible to pass the verification. Furthermore, the few retail forex brokers holding NFA licenses primarily serve US residents through their US-based operations. Non-US residents who wish to open an account usually need to submit their applications through regulatory bodies established by these brokers in other regions, such as the UK (regulated by the UK Financial Conduct Authority, FCA) or Australia (regulated by the Australian Securities and Investments Commission, ASIC). Whether an account can be opened depends on the regional service policies of the corresponding regulatory body.
Secondly, strict Know Your Customer (KYC) and Anti-Money Laundering (AML) processes and identity verification standards further raise the bar for Chinese citizens opening accounts with US forex brokers. Under NFA regulations, brokers must implement strict KYC and anti-money laundering verification processes. Chinese citizens applying to open an account must submit a series of supporting documents, including a valid passport, proof of address in the US or other overseas regions, proof of the legality of the source of funds, and tax residency declaration documents (such as the W-8BEN form). For applicants who can only provide a mainland China ID card and proof of address, but cannot provide proof of overseas residency or employment, their account opening applications are almost guaranteed to fail the broker's review. At the same time, brokers may also use various auxiliary methods to verify identity during the review process, such as determining the applicant's actual location through IP address location and verifying the location of their mobile phone number. If the applicant is found to be in mainland China, their account opening may be directly restricted, or further supporting documents proving long-term overseas residency may be required.
China's domestic regulatory policies and foreign exchange management regulations are also important constraints affecting US forex brokers' account opening services for Chinese citizens. Currently, mainland China has not yet opened retail forex margin trading; individual foreign exchange purchases are only permitted for approved compliant purposes such as tourism, study abroad, and medical treatment, and the use of purchased foreign exchange funds for overseas investment activities is explicitly prohibited. Against this backdrop, if overseas forex brokers proactively offer forex margin trading account opening services to mainland Chinese residents, they may be suspected of illegally soliciting clients. Therefore, most US forex brokers that prioritize compliance actively limit their services to mainland Chinese clients to avoid crossing Chinese regulatory red lines. Furthermore, cross-border fund transfers are strictly regulated. Mainland Chinese individuals have clearly defined annual limits on foreign exchange purchases and settlements, and remittances must undergo compliance review. If funds are illegally transferred for overseas forex investment, risks such as account freezing and financial losses may arise.
Differences in investor protection and compensation coverage also reduce the willingness of US forex brokers to serve Chinese citizens. US investor protection agencies, such as the Securities Investor Protection Corporation (SIPC), primarily cover the trading accounts of US residents. Non-US residents (including Chinese citizens) typically cannot access such compensation. This situation not only increases the risk exposure of Chinese citizens in US forex trading but also forces brokers to bear higher potential risks when dealing with non-local clients, thus reducing their incentive to offer account opening services to Chinese citizens.
Regarding feasible account opening paths and related precautions, qualified Chinese citizens can apply for account opening through compliant channels. Specifically, Chinese citizens holding U.S. permanent residency (green card), U.S. work visa, long-term residency certificate, or U.S. tax residency status can prepare and submit complete supporting documents according to NFA regulatory requirements and apply for account opening with a qualified U.S. forex broker. Once approved, they can begin trading. For Chinese citizens without the above qualifications, an alternative is to choose an international forex broker that also holds licenses from other major regulatory bodies such as the UK's FCA and Australia's ASIC. They can submit an account opening application through its non-U.S. regulated entity. However, before applying, it is essential to confirm that the regulated entity is authorized to provide services to Chinese citizens, and the entire trading process must strictly comply with China's foreign exchange management regulations and tax reporting requirements. It is particularly important to note that mainland Chinese residents attempting to circumvent the aforementioned restrictions by opening accounts through non-compliant channels will face multiple risks, including difficulties in remittance of funds, freezing of trading accounts by regulatory agencies or brokers, and inability to seek legal recourse in case of trading disputes. Furthermore, illegally using foreign exchange funds for overseas foreign exchange investment may also violate relevant laws and regulations such as the "Regulations of the People's Republic of China on Foreign Exchange Control," incurring corresponding legal liabilities.
In summary, while there is no explicit ban on Chinese citizens opening foreign exchange trading accounts at the US regulatory level, the strict regulatory requirements of the CFTC and NFA, the cross-border compliance and risk control needs of US forex brokers, coupled with the constraints of mainland China's foreign exchange regulatory policies, make it extremely difficult for Chinese citizens holding only mainland Chinese documents and lacking relevant overseas qualifications to open accounts with US forex brokers. However, for Chinese citizens with long-term US residency or US tax residency status, they can submit account opening applications to licensed US forex brokers through compliant procedures and, upon approval, participate in relevant two-way forex trading.

Canadian regulators do not have explicit prohibitions on Chinese citizens opening accounts, but compliance reviews are often difficult to pass.

---

In the two-way trading scenario of forex investment, Canada has no national regulations explicitly restricting or prohibiting Chinese citizens from opening accounts. This regulatory approach differs from some countries that explicitly impose restrictions. However, it should be noted that forex brokers regulated by the Investment Industry Regulatory Organization of Canada (IIROC) generally combine their own compliance policies, anti-money laundering requirements, and customer due diligence (CDD) standards with relevant Chinese regulations to set account opening thresholds for Chinese citizens, especially those residing in mainland China. Some institutions even directly restrict the provision of services. Essentially, these restrictions do not stem from explicit prohibitions at the Canadian government level; the core driving force lies in the brokers' own risk management needs and considerations for avoiding cross-border compliance risks.
Specifically, the core restrictive factors affecting Chinese citizens opening accounts are multifaceted, with differences in broker compliance policies being the primary variable. To mitigate the risks of cross-border regulatory conflicts, most brokers holding IIROC licenses explicitly define their service scope in their user agreements or account opening procedures. They generally exclude "mainland Chinese residents who do not reside or work in Canada or other overseas regions long-term," accepting only applications from Chinese citizens holding proof of long-term residency or employment in Canada or overseas (such as permanent resident status, work visas), or possessing local tax residency. Even some internationally renowned brokers with IIROC licenses (such as FXCM) typically do not provide services to non-residents through their Canadian operating entities. Instead, they serve global clients through entities regulated by other regional regulatory bodies (such as entities regulated by the UK Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) or the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC). In this case, whether a Chinese citizen can successfully open an account depends primarily on the regional service policies of that cross-border regulatory body, rather than the compliance requirements corresponding to their IIROC license.
The strict enforcement of anti-money laundering and Know Your Customer (KYC) procedures further raises the bar for Chinese citizens opening accounts. Under the mandatory requirements of the IIROC, brokers regulated by it must implement strict KYC processes and anti-money laundering verification mechanisms. When Chinese citizens apply to open an account, they must provide a valid passport, proof of address (which must be a residential address in Canada or another overseas region), and proof of the legality of the source of funds. Some brokers also require tax residency declaration documents (such as Form W-8BEN for non-US tax residents and Form W-9 for US tax residents). Conversely, if an applicant can only provide a mainland China ID card and proof of address, without any proof of overseas residency or employment, their account opening application will usually fail the broker's compliance review. This verification standard is essentially a necessary measure for brokers to avoid money laundering risks and cross-border regulatory responsibilities.
Domestic regulatory and foreign exchange policy constraints in China are another key external factor influencing brokers' service strategies. Currently, retail foreign exchange margin trading is not open in mainland China, and the amount and purpose of individual foreign exchange purchases are strictly regulated, only allowed for compliant scenarios such as tourism, study abroad, and medical treatment, and explicitly prohibited from being used for overseas investment. Against this backdrop, if overseas brokers actively provide forex trading services to mainland Chinese residents, they may be suspected of illegal solicitation and face potential regulatory accountability risks. Therefore, most IIROC-regulated brokers adhering to compliance principles proactively use technical means to restrict account opening from mainland IP addresses or mandate proof of overseas residency during the review process to avoid crossing Chinese regulatory red lines. This passive constraint further reduces the space for mainland Chinese residents to open accounts.
Differences in the coverage of investor compensation mechanisms also indirectly reduce brokers' willingness to serve non-local clients. Canada has an Investor Protection Fund (CIPF), whose core function is to provide financial compensation to investors in extreme cases such as broker bankruptcy. However, it should be clarified that CIPF coverage is limited to Canadian resident accounts; non-residents (including Chinese citizens) typically cannot enjoy this compensation right. For brokers, providing services to non-residents without the support of a compensation mechanism not only increases the difficulty of handling customer disputes but also increases their own operational risks. Therefore, most institutions proactively reduce their service scope to non-local clients. While this factor is not a direct restriction, its impact on the feasibility of opening accounts is equally significant.
From a practical perspective, there are clear and feasible paths for Chinese citizens to open Canadian regulated forex accounts, but certain prerequisites and precautions must be met. The primary applicable scenarios are for Chinese citizens holding Canadian permanent resident (PR) status, work visas, student visas, or proof of long-term residence in Canada, as well as those who have become Canadian tax residents. These individuals can prepare complete documentation of their identity, residence, and funds, in accordance with IIROC regulatory requirements, and submit an account opening application to a compliant IIROC-regulated broker. The account will then be opened after completing the required review process.
For Chinese citizens who do not meet the Canadian residency or status requirements, an alternative option is to choose an international broker holding licenses from internationally recognized regulatory bodies such as the UK's FCA or Australia's ASIC, and submit an account opening application through their non-Canadian regulated entity. However, it is crucial to ensure that the international broker's corresponding regulatory body is authorized to provide services to Chinese citizens when choosing this alternative, and to strictly comply with Chinese foreign exchange management regulations and tax reporting requirements to avoid risks arising from irregular operations.
It is particularly important to emphasize the compliance risk warning. Mainland Chinese residents attempting to circumvent the aforementioned restrictions by opening accounts through non-compliant channels will face multiple risks, including but not limited to: difficulties in remittance of funds (i.e., funds used for overseas investment do not comply with Chinese regulatory requirements and may be intercepted during the remittance process); account freezing risk (i.e., overseas brokers may directly freeze account funds if they discover falsified or irregular account opening materials during subsequent verification); and difficulties in resolving disputes (i.e., accounts opened through non-compliant channels typically lack protection from regulatory agencies in both jurisdictions, making it difficult to assert rights through legal channels in case of disputes with brokers). Furthermore, illegally using funds for overseas investment violates relevant regulations such as the "Administrative Measures for Individual Foreign Exchange" and may face regulatory penalties.
In summary, while Canadian regulators do not have explicit prohibitions on Chinese citizens opening accounts, and the overall regulatory environment is relatively open, IIROC-regulated brokers, based on considerations of cross-border compliance risk avoidance and their own risk control management, coupled with constraints from China's domestic foreign exchange regulatory policies, make it extremely difficult for mainland Chinese residents without overseas residency or work permits to open accounts, and in most cases, they will fail to pass compliance reviews. Chinese citizens with proof of overseas residence or who have obtained local tax residency status can successfully open an account with an IIROC-regulated broker by submitting complete documentation and completing the compliance review process. Other individuals with forex investment needs should prioritize compliant channels that conform to Chinese regulatory guidelines to avoid violating regulatory red lines.

---

• 
• 

---

13711580480@139.com

+86 137 1158 0480

+86 137 1158 0480

+86 137 1158 0480

z.x.n@139.com

Mr. Z-X-N

China · Guangzhou

---